Overview
Technical editing is the work of taking a draft written by an engineer and making it accurate, readable, and consistent before it is published in a technical media outlet such as a company engineering blog or an interview series. This page covers what that editing is responsible for, how to check technical terms, and the order in which to work through a draft.What technical editing is
Three roles
Technical editing has three roles. Each one protects a different thing, so a draft can pass one and still fail another.
Accuracy comes first because an error in a technical article costs more than
an awkward sentence. A reader who follows an incorrect step loses time, and
a reader who notices the error stops trusting the rest of the article.
Readability is judged against the target reader, not the editor. An editor
who already knows the topic will fill gaps without noticing them, so the
check is whether the text works for someone who does not.
Consistency matters at the level of the outlet rather than the single
article. When each article spells the same product or concept differently,
readers start to doubt whether the outlet checks anything at all.
Checking technical terms
What to check
Term checks catch errors that a general proofreading pass misses, because a misspelled product name or an outdated version number reads as perfectly fluent text.
Version and time dependence needs the most attention. A statement such as
“this option is the default” may be true when written and false a year
later, so the article should say which version it was verified against.
Examples to avoid and recommend
Keep a term list
Checking terms from memory is unreliable, because each editor remembers a different set of rules. A term list fixes the rules in one place and turns the check into a comparison. A practical term list has three columns: the correct form, examples of incorrect forms, and a note explaining the rule or its source. The note matters because it lets the next editor decide edge cases instead of guessing.The editing process
Edit a draft in order from the largest unit to the smallest. Fixing wording in a paragraph that later gets cut wastes the work, so structure comes before sentences.1
Check the structure
Confirm the target reader. Check that the headline
promises what the article delivers, and that the sections follow an
order the reader can follow.
2
Check the facts
Verify each claim that can be wrong: definitions, classifications,
numbers, version-dependent behavior, and comparisons. Accept as evidence
only primary sources such as official documentation or specifications.
When a claim cannot be verified, ask the author for the source rather
than rewriting it.
3
Check the terms
Compare the terms in the draft against the term list. Unify spelling
variants, expand abbreviations on first use, and confirm that proper
nouns and version references are correct.
4
Adjust the wording
Shorten long sentences, remove redundant phrasing, and replace jargon
the target reader may not know. Keep each change small and explainable.
5
Confirm with the author
Send the edited draft back with the reason for each substantive change.
The author approves the final version before it is published.
Caveats
Respect the author’s intent
The article belongs to its author. An editor’s change is justified when it serves accuracy, readability, or consistency; a change made only because the editor would have phrased it differently is not. When a passage is unclear, ask what the author meant before rewriting it. A rewrite based on a wrong guess can change the technical meaning while sounding more polished, which is worse than the original.Avoid over-editing
Over-editing removes the author’s voice and makes every article in the outlet sound alike. It also slows the process, because the author has to review changes that were never necessary. Limit each edit to the problem it fixes. When an error is found, correct that passage only, and leave the surrounding text and the author’s style as they are.Separate required changes from suggestions when returning a draft.
Required changes are errors in fact, terms, or the outlet’s standards;
suggestions are improvements the author may accept or decline. Marking the
difference keeps the author’s decisions in the author’s hands.
Related pages
The role of DevRel
Where technical media fits among the ways a company takes part in the
engineering community.